Effective Mediation Resources Oregon Mediation Center, Inc.

-- -- -- --
Resources Home
-- -- -- --
Training Manual
-- -- -- --
Forms & Resources
-- -- -- --
Workplace Articles
-- -- -- --
Conflict Systems
-- -- -- --
Contact
-- -- -- --
Mediation Center Home

Training Manual > 10 - Groups > Consensus Model


Decision-Making Standard & Consensus Model

Large groups also need to decide what their decision-making standard will be. Will it be "majority rules," "super-majority rules," some type of "consensus," or "unanimity." Sometimes there will be a combination of decision-making standards. For example, the group may adopt some consensus standard, such as 80% support, on individual issues, but require unanimity on the overall agreement when considered as a package. It is generally better to have some voting response system that is more sensitive than a simple and polarized "yea" or "nay" system. The following "levels of agreement" model can be used in multi-party mediation and facilitation situations. Participants can be encouraged to use their number of raised fingers to indicate their level of support for a proposal. In this model, where the group members will respond with anywhere from a "1" to a "5" or "6" depending on their degree of support for a proposal, it is common for the group to want to hear from anyone voting a "4," "5," or "6" to see if that participant's concerns can be addressed by a somewhat modified or refined proposal. After hearing from such initial "non-supporters," the group may, depending on its decision-making standard process agreements, permit itself to still take action if a near unanimity (80-90%) exists. Here is one levels of agreement consensus voting model:

1. I give an unqualified "yes" to the proposal. 2. I find the proposal acceptable. 3. I can live with the proposal although I'm not especially enthusiastic about it. 4. I do not fully agree with the proposal and need to register my view about it. However, I do not choose to block the proposal. I am willing to support the decision, if adopted, because I trust the wisdom of the group. 5. I do not agree with the proposal and feel the need to stand in the way of this decision being accepted. 6. I feel that we have no clear sense of unity in the group. We need to do more work before consensus can be reached. The above model can be simplified as:

1. Strongly support 2. Support 3. Willing to go along with 4. Want to be heard 5. Unwilling to support





This site managed with Dynamic Website Technology from Mediate.com
Products and Services